SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
SARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 4749 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.REJI, SMT.THARA THAMBAN, SRI.B.BIPIN, SRI.ARUN BOSE, SHRI.SUNEESH KUMAR R.
For the Respondents: SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN, SRI.SANAL P RAJ, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous case is warranted when the underpinning appeal has been resolved.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioner challenges an order in C.M.P. No.1523 of 2021, where the interim maintenance order has been kept in abeyance during an appeal. Facts of the Case: The petitioner sought to contest the abeyance order impacting ongoing execution processes, with the appeal referred having since been disposed of.

Findings of Court:
The court recognized the appeal's disposal as a significant development, allowing withdrawal of the case.

Issues: The primary question was whether the challenge to the abeyance of interim maintenance was still valid post-disposition of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the appeal's resolution negated the basis for the Crl.M.C., leading to dismissal.

Result: The Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. challenge to magistrate order. (Para 1)
2. withdrawal is appropriate after appeal is resolved. (Para 2)

O R D E R

=========

This Crl.M.C. is filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 27.09.2021 in C.M.P. No.1523 of 2021 in M.C.No.67 of 2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Haripad.

2. The petitioner in the Crl.M.C was the respondent in the C.M.P. The learned Magistrate in Annexure A4 order in the C.M.P, which is impugned in this Crl.M.C., has concluded as follows:

“9. Matter being so, the petitioner herein having preferred an appeal against the order of interim maintenance in C.M.P No.1813 of 2020 before the Hon’ble Additional Sessions Court-I, Mavelikkara and the same is in pending consideration before the Hon’ble Additional Sessions Court-I, Mavelikkara. Hence, the order in C.M.P.No.1813 of 2020 and the further proceedings in C.M.P.No.1200 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.1579 of 2021 for execution of the order can be considered on report of appeal. The order in C.M.P.No.1813 of 2020 is kept on abeyance till report of Appeal.”

2. Aggrieved by the above direction to keep in abeyance the order in C.M.P.No.1813 of 2020 during the pendency of the Criminal Appeal, this Crl.M.C. had been filed. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Advocate Sri.Arjun.R, representing Advocate Sri.M.V.Thamban, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Criminal Appeal referred to in the above paragraph already stands disposed of vide judgment dated 31.01.2024. It is submitted that in the light of the said subsequent development, nothing survives in this Crl.M.C., and that the same may be permitted to be withdrawn.

In view of the above, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top