IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ABDULLA T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14154 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.519/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the offences and nature of the charge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the necessity of custodial interrogation. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-
arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.
519/2025 of Thondernadu Police Station, Wayanad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 7 5(1)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 r/w Section 8 and Section 9 (f), (l) & (m) r/w Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant, being the Madrassa teacher of the victim, aged 8 years, had repeatedly committed aggravated sexual assault upon her by rubbing and catching hold of her private parts with sexual intent in the Al Madrassathul Islamiyya Madrassa at Korome while she was studying in the 2nd standard at Madrassa and thereby committed the said offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Krishna Prasad S., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.
6. The law regarding the grant or refusal of pre-arrest bail is well settled. Pre-arrest bail cannot be granted as a matter of course. The power under Section 482 of BNSS could be exercised only when a special case is made out, that too, recording reasons thereof. Perusal of the case diary reveals that the accusation made against the applicant is very serious in nature, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. The applicant is a Madrassa teacher, aged 68 years and the victim is an 8 year old girl.
7. The investigation is in a preliminary stage. The custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary for the investigation. As rightly argued by the learned Public Prosecutor, the possibility of the applicant influencing the witnesses and interfering with the investigation cannot be ruled out if he is released on bail. Considering the gravity of the offence and stage of the investigation, I am of the view that this is not a fit case where the extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court under Section 482 of BNSS could be invoked. The bail application is, accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.