IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NAZEER N.A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibits P9 order and Exhibit P11 notice and to quash the same.
ii. dispense with the production of English translation of vernacular documents iii. grant such other relief’s which this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”[SIC]
2. Petitioners are the tenants in the shop rooms owned by the 4th respondent. The 4th respondent sought demolition of the said shop rooms alleging imminent danger by filing W.P.(C) No.24963 of 2024. This Court disposed of the above Writ Petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to decide Ext.P5 representation in that Writ Petition after hearing the parties and considering Ext.P2 expert report. It is the case of the petitioners that the 3rd respondent appointed another engineer from the Government Engineering College, Thrissur to report regarding the stability of the building. The engineer from the Government Engineering College, Thrissur submitted a report before the 3rd respondent. But a copy of the same was not given to the petitioners in s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.