Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
MADHU V – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition challenging dismissal of writ appeal on employment benefits. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims of continuous employment and entitlement to benefits. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court found no error in previous judgment warranting review. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI ,J None appears for the petitioner. Sri. Suvin R. Menon, learned Senior Panel Counsel appears for the respondents in this case.
CM.Appl. No. 1/2025 CM.Appl. No. 1/2025 is for condonation of delay. The Review Petition has been filed with a delay of 50 days. Having perused the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay, we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. C.M.Appln. is allowed.
2. The present Review Petition filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, challenges the judgment dated 04.02.2025 arising out of WA No. 1829/2018 whereby the Writ Appeal has been dismissed.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the Review Petitioner had filed the Writ Petition before the learned Single Judge praying for the following reliefs:
“i. To Issue a wri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
