Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ARYA SASI (MINOR) (REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER & GUARDIAN SASI K) – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. participant's evaluation in competition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding evaluation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial review limitations on evaluations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. non-interference in expert decisions. (Para 7) |
| 5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner was a participant in the event 'Mohiniyattom' in the Palakkad District School Kalolsavam 2025-26. She was placed in the ninth place with 'A' Grade. Aggrieved by the evaluation conducted, she preferred an appeal. By Ext. P2 order dated 13.12.2025, the appeal was rejected, against which this writ petition has been preferred.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader.
3. The main contention urged on behalf of the petitioner is that her performance on the day of the event was par excellence and she ought to have been awarded the first place with A grade. Petitioner contended that the Judges erroneously placed her in the ninth position which is required to be set aside and she be placed in the first place.
4. The Appellate Authority had considered her contentions and rejected the same after verifying the score sheets, Stage Manager's report, v
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
