Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUNIL JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for transit bail. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on bail principles. (Para 5) |
| 3. final order regarding bail. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The applicant is accused No.2 in C.S. No.312730 of 2024 on the files of the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta. The offence alleged against the applicant is punishable under Section
25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act , 2007.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that non bailable warrant issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta is pending against him. It is in these circumstances that he has approached this Court seeking transit bail to approach the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta to seek regular bail. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The offence alleged against the applicant is bailable in nature. Relying onPriya Indoria v. State of Karnataka [2023 KHC OnLine 6997] andSamdeep Varghese v. State of Kerala [2010 (2) KHC 881] , the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that though this Court is not in a positi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
