Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
GIREESH VARMA.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court considers appeal against a prior conviction in light of settlements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. affidavit allowed as composition request under ni act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final ruling sets aside lower court verdict and acquits. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The challenge in this Crl. Revision Petition is to the judgment dated 27.06.2019 in S.T. No.347 of 2016 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta, which has been confirmed by the Additional District & Sessions Court-III, Pathanamthitta, in the judgment dated
16.10.2023 in Crl.Appeal No.63 of 2019.
2. The revision petitioner has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 , and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for four months and pay a fine of Rs.7,10,000/-.
3. Respondent No.2/complainant appearing through Advocates Smt. Annie M. Abraham & Sri. K. Suresh Babu submitted that respondent No.2 /complainant has no surviving grievance against the revision petitioner/accused. The learned counsel submitted that the revision petitioner paid the entire amount due to the complainant. The complainant filed an affidavit in support of his contention that the dispute between he and the revision
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
