Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
DEVAPRIYA KIRAN, PARVATHI KRISHNA K., SWATHIKA K T., NAYANIKA V., SHREYA SHYANTH, NIYA N NRIPESH, PARVATHY R NAIR, VIAGA RATHEESH, PARVATHY S NAIR, DEVI PRIYA M.P. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners participated in a performance event and were dissatisfied with evaluation results. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court noted vague arguments against the appellate authority's decision. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court explained limitations on interfering with performance evaluations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. established criteria for judicial intervention in performance disputes. (Para 7) |
| 5. final judgment confirmed dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioners participated in the event 'Chavittu Nadakam (High School - General Section' in the Kozhikode Revenue District School Kalolsavam 2025-26. They secured fourth place with 'A' Grade. Aggrieved by the evaluation conducted, they preferred an appeal. By Ext.P3 order dated 04.12.2025, the appeal was rejected against which this writ petition has been preferred.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the appellate authority dismissed the appeal without giving any specific reasons and that its decision is vague. It was also pointed out that there was no signature on the score sheet in relation to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
