Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
V.MUTHAMIL SELVI – Appellant
Versus
INDANE OIL CORPORATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for agency operation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' argument on document obligations. (Para 3) |
| 3. court allows time for document submission. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 1 5 t h day of January, 202 6
1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a writ of mandamus, directing Respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the regular conduct of the gas agency business run by the petitioner as an agent of the 1st respondent, pursuant to Ext.P3 Notice.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the LPG distributorship was granted to her father, Sri. G. Vaikundam, and he had been conducting the gas agency. On his death, the petitioner has been conducting the gas agency. There are certain disputes between the petitioner and her sister, who is the third respondent. Now, after the issuance of Ext.P3 Show Cause Notice alleging certain discrepancies, the respondent- Corporation is threatening to take coercive steps to stop the gas agency, alleging that the petitioner has not uploaded certain documents which are not presently in her possession. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 Representation in answer to Ext.P3.
3. The learned Standing Counsel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
