Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
N.J.JOHNSON – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal basis for land inclusion (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. assessment of land suitability (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. practical challenges in land management (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial review criteria for suitability determination (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. call for records leading to Ext.P16 and issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing Ext.P16.
ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to exclude petitioner’s property from data bank prepared under Sec. 5(4) of Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act , within such time as may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii. award cost of this proceedings to the petitioner. "
[SIC]
2. Petitioner is an advocate practising in this Court, and his submission is that he is approaching this Court for the 6th time for getting 7.69 Ares of land (19 cents) situated in Guruvayur village, abutting the National Highway and situated in the commercial area as per the town planning notification to be removed from the data bank prepared under Sec. 5(4) of Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act , 2008 (for short, Act 2008).
3. Petitioner along with hi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
