IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANCHARY OCEANIC PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VADAKARAPATHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. inspection revealed no pollution, necessitating reconsideration. (Para 4) |
| 2. court sets aside previous orders for reconsideration. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i)issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ quashing Ext-P15 Stop Memo dated 06.11.2025 and Ext-P16 communication dated 07.11.2025.
ii) issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to permit operation of the petitioner’s unit under valid licences and PCB consent.
iii) declare that the Panchayat has no jurisdiction to suspend or revoke the licence on environmental grounds once PCB has confirmed compliance.
iv) grant such other reliefs as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court” [SIC]
2. The petitioner challenged Exts.P15 and P16.
Ext.P15 is a stop memo issued by the 1st respondent, Vadakarapathy Grama Panchayat, Palakkad. Ext.P16 is a proceedings of the Secretary of the same Panchayat. 3. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration on 04.12.2025, this Court passed the following order:
“The 2nd respondent – Environmental Engineer will inspect the premises of the petitioner and find out whether there is any pollution either by smell or smoke. To facil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.