SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2228

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHAFEEQUE.P.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14460 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JASNEED JAMAL, SRI.P.SAMSUDIN, SMT.DEVIKA E.D., SMT.LIRA A.B.
For the Respondents: SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA

Court granted pre-arrest bail to accused, stressing absence of evidence and imposing strict conditions on their release.

Headnote:The application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks pre-arrest bail for the second and third accused. They were alleged to have assaulted the complainant and a friend. The court finds no material connecting them to the crime and grants bail, noting minor injuries sustained. Main issues included whether their release would affect the investigation. The court ruled that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and imposed strict bail conditions. The application is allowed subject to conditions outlined.

Judgement Key Points

The accused are alleged to have committed offences punishable under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). Specifically, the prosecution case mentions the following sections:

  • Section 189(2)
  • Section 191(2)
  • Section 191(3)
  • Section 126(2)
  • Section 115(2)
  • Section 118(1)
  • Section 296(b)
  • Section 351(3)
  • Section 110 read with Section 190

These sections encompass various criminal offenses, including wrongful restraint, assault, use of deadly weapons, and other related acts (!) (!) .


Table of Content
1. arguments presented for and against bail. (Para 1)
2. criminal allegations against the accused. (Para 2)
3. court's observation on injuries and bail necessity. (Para 4 , 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No.938/2025 of Valappatanam Police Station, Kannur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section s 189 (2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 110 read with Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

7.11.2025 at 12.45 am, the applicant along with the remaining accused wrongfully restrained the defcto complainant and his friend Mr. Sajid, assaulted them with deadly weapons and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri. Jasneed Jamal, the learned counsel for the applicants and Smt. M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary. 5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The wound certificate would show that the injuries sustained are minor in nature. The accused No.1 who used the iron rod has already been granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court, Thalassery. Considering the allegations made against the applicants, their custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicants.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicants shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting themselves to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top