SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2301

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
BIJU JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
LIBO JOHN, LITO JOHN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PAULSON M.J., SHRI.TOBIAS BENNY

Table of Content
1. indigency claiming essentials (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. assessment of sufficient means and ruling (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner in Original Petition (Indigent) No.1/2023 on the file of the Subordinate Judge’s Court, Sulthan Bathery, has filed this appeal aggrieved by the rejection of the application filed under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure .

2. According to the appellant, respondents/defendants offered to sell a property of the 2nd respondent to the appellant and a sale agreement was executed on 9.2.2011. The total consideration fixed was Rs.1,50,67,500/-. Appellant had given Rs.10,00,000/- as advance consideration. On 24.2.2011 and 7.5.2011, Rs.20,00,000/- each were paid to the 1st respondent, the power of attorney holder of the 2nd respondent. These payments were endorsed on the reverse side of the agreement. The appellant entered into another agreement with two others on the strength of the agreement executed between him and the 1st respondent for sale of the same property for a higher consideration.

3. According to the appellant, on 9.2.2011, he was detained and the agreement was forcefully taken from him by the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top