IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
BIJU JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
LIBO JOHN, LITO JOHN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. indigency claiming essentials (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. assessment of sufficient means and ruling (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner in Original Petition (Indigent) No.1/2023 on the file of the Subordinate Judge’s Court, Sulthan Bathery, has filed this appeal aggrieved by the rejection of the application filed under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure .
2. According to the appellant, respondents/defendants offered to sell a property of the 2nd respondent to the appellant and a sale agreement was executed on 9.2.2011. The total consideration fixed was Rs.1,50,67,500/-. Appellant had given Rs.10,00,000/- as advance consideration. On 24.2.2011 and 7.5.2011, Rs.20,00,000/- each were paid to the 1st respondent, the power of attorney holder of the 2nd respondent. These payments were endorsed on the reverse side of the agreement. The appellant entered into another agreement with two others on the strength of the agreement executed between him and the 1st respondent for sale of the same property for a higher consideration.
3. According to the appellant, on 9.2.2011, he was detained and the agreement was forcefully taken from him by the respon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.