IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SRI.PRATHYURAJ E.R. – Appellant
Versus
1 THE TAHSILDAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court directs timely processing of application for certificates. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT Petitioner’s short grievance is that his application for attested sketch in respect of his property is not being acted upon by the 1st respondent. Similarly, his application for non-assignment certificate and demarcation certificate is also not being acted upon by the 2nd respondent. Both these sets of documents are required for the purpose of applying for a quarrying lease in terms of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules , 1967 (K.M.M.C.Rules). The petitioner would submit that the application is not being proceeded for the reason that the property in question was earlier a plantation.
2. However, the learned Government Pleader, after taking instructions, would submit that there is no objection based on the property being a plantation earlier and that the petitioner’s applications are being processed.
3. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent/Tahsildar to issue the attested sketch, if the petitioner is otherwise entitled to the same, within a period of three weeks from today. There will be a similar direction to the 2nd respondent/Village
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.