SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2447

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THOMAS VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL), SRI.MANU SRINATH, SHRI.LIJO JOHN THAMPY, SMT.NIVEDITA MUCHILOTE, SHRI.RIYAS M.B., SMT.RUKSANA SATHAR P.A.
For the Respondents: ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SR GP, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE

JUDGMENT

When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.

Liberty is granted.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top