Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
THOMAS V. KURIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims threats necessitating police protection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents deny tenancy and present counterclaims. (Para 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes resolution of civil disputes over police protection. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks a direction for the grant of adequate protection to the life of the petitioner.
2. According to the petitioner, he is conducting a business by name ‘VTS Developers’ and earns his livelihood from the said business. Petitioner alleges that the 5th respondent is the landlord of a residential building wherein petitioner was inducted as a tenant. It is also alleged that in the year 2020, an advertisement was published by respondents 5 and 6 proposing to sell their residential property situated in Survey Nos.205/10C, 205/10A and 205/10B of Pathanamthitta village, having an extent of 14.51 Ares along with the building No.XII/447 situated therein. Pursuant to the said advertisement negotiations were conducted, and an agreement for sale, as Ext.P1, was entered into with the 9th respondent. Petitioner contends that the total sale consideration fixed therein was Rs.1,85,00,000/- and by Exhibit.P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
