SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2522

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
K.K. RAMACHANDRA PANICKER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35294 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.S. SUBHASH CHAND
For the Respondents: SMT.NISHA GEORGE, SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.), SHRI.ANSHIN K.K

Petitioners must raise their contentions before the competent authority upon issuance of show cause notice under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, as they cannot contest the inquiry report at this stage.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Sections 65, 68 - Enquiry report and subsequent show cause notice - Petitioners challenged the inquiry report and order initiated under Section 68, asserting they cannot contest at this stage as per Kudayathoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. case - The court held that the petitioners must raise all contentions before the competent authority upon issuance of show cause notice as per Section 68(2). (Paras 2-4)

(B) Rights of affected parties - The court discussed the statutory rights of parties under Sections 32 and 68 of the Act, emphasizing the obligation to provide an opportunity of hearing only after a tentative decision is taken based on the inquiry report. (Paras 3, 4)

Facts of the case:
This writ petition was filed by multiple petitioners challenging the legitimacy of an inquiry report prepared under Section 65 of the 1969 Act and consequent orders.

Findings of Court:
Petitioners are required to take their contentions before the competent authority upon a show cause notice is issued under Section 68(2).

Issues: The petitioners sought to challenge the inquiry report before the competent authority, which the court affirmed cannot be done at the present stage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a challenge to the inquiry report can only be made after the competent authority issues a show cause notice, maintaining that the statutory process must be followed for a fair hearing.

Result: Writ petition stands dismissed.

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P7 enquiry report under Section 65 of the Kerala Co-operatie Societies Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 1969 Act), Ext.P9 (a) order issued by the competent authority under sub-section (1) of Section 68 of the 1969 Act, and Ext.P10 which is the consequent show cause notice issued to the 1stpetitioner by the Enquiry Officer appointed by the competent authority.

2. The learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents would submit that, going by the law laid down by the Full Bench of this court inKudayathoor Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General) 2022 (3) KLT 222 (F.B.) the petitioner cannot challenge the proceedings at this stage and it is for the petitioners to take all contentions before the competent authority, if and when a show cause notice is issued to the petitioners under the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 68 of the 1969 Act.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned senior Government Pleader, the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents, I am of the view that there is considerable merit in the contentions taken by the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents that the petitioners cannot at this stage challenge the enquiry report prepared under the provisions of Section 65 of the 1969 Act and also the order directing the initiation of proceedings under Section 68 of the 1969 Act. In paragraph 17 of the judgment in Kudayathoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (supra) reads thus:-

“17. As noted, Section 66 of the Act empowers the Registrar, on his own motion or on the application of a creditor of a society, to inspect or direct any person authorised by him by order in writing in its behalf to inspect the books of the society. Similarly, Section 65 empowers the Registrar, on his own motion or on any of the circumstances mentioned in clauses (b) to (f) of sub-section (1) of , to order an inquiry by himself or by a person authorised by an order in writing into the constitution, working and financial condition of the society, if he is satisfied that it is necessary to do so. also empowers the Registrar to supersede the Managing Committee of a society in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 32, if any major defect in the constitution or working or financial condition of the society is noticed in an inquiry under (1). Section 68 provides that if in the course of an inquiry or inspection it is found that any person who is or was entrusted with any organisation or management of co-operative societies or who is or has at any time been an officer or an employee of the society has made any payment contrary to the Act or the Rules or the bye-laws or has caused to any loss or damage in the assets of the society by breach of trust or wilful negligence or mismanagement or has misappropriated or fraudulently retained any money or other property belonging to such society or has destroyed or caused the destruction of the records, the Registrar may, on his own motion, or on the application of the committee, liquidator or any creditor, inquire himself or direct any person authorised by him by an order in writing in this behalf, to inquire into the conduct of such person. (2) provides that where an inquiry is made under sub-section (1), the Registrar may, after giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard, by order in writing, require him to repay or restore the money or other property or any part thereof, with interest at such rate or to pay contribution and costs or compensation to such extent, as the Registrar may consider just and equitable. The aforesaid provisions would indicate that the Registrar would be competent to supersede the Managing Committee of the society under Section 32 of the Act or surcharge the members of the Managing Committee or others under based o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top