SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
NARAYANAN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE
For the Respondents: SRI.P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE

JUDGMENT

The appeal arises out of the concurrent findings rendered by the Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor, in O.S.No.81/2007, as confirmed by the Sub Court, Perumbavoor in A.S.No.42/2010.

2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:

2.1. The respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for declaration of title and injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property. According to the plaintiff, both brothers were granted respective shares under a deed of partition. The partition deed was executed in the year 1994. On 24.10.1994, plaint schedule property having an extent of 3.35 Ares was allotted to the plaintiff as per Partition Deed No.5241/1994, which is shown as Item No.2 in B schedule in the above mentioned partition deed. Under the partition deed, the survey number under which the property was allotted is Old Survey No.117/7. The plaintiff contended that the defendant is trying to trespass into the plaint schedule property with an intention to annex the same along with his property. It was further contended that, the property included in B schedule to the said partition deed is in Re-survey No.134/20.

2.2. The defendant resi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top