IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
NARAYANAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of property title by the plaintiff. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments around the validity of possession evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court’s determination based on evidentiary admissions. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
The appeal arises out of the concurrent findings rendered by the Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor, in O.S.No.81/2007, as confirmed by the Sub Court, Perumbavoor in A.S.No.42/2010.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:
2.1. The respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for declaration of title and injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property. According to the plaintiff, both brothers were granted respective shares under a deed of partition. The partition deed was executed in the year 1994. On 24.10.1994, plaint schedule property having an extent of 3.35 Ares was allotted to the plaintiff as per Partition Deed No.5241/1994, which is shown as Item No.2 in B schedule in the above mentioned partition deed. Under the partition deed, the survey number under which the property was allotted is Old Survey No.117/7. The plaintiff contended that the defendant is trying to trespass into the plaint schedul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.