IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
LEON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of offences alleged against the accused. (Para 2) |
| 2. court’s rationale for granting bail and conditions imposed. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by counsel regarding innocence and evidence. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS )
seeking regular bail.
2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.1084/2025 of Anthikkad Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 296 (b), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 110 r/w Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on
18.12.2025 at about 10:45 p.m., due to previous animosity, applicant Nos. 2 to 4 assaulted the de-facto complainant by uttering obscene words. Thereafter, applicant No.1 hit him with an iron pipe. If he had not warded off the attack of the applicant No.1, his death would have occurred and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Vishnu Bhuvanendran, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.