SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2617

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SMITHA D. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 216 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.T.S.SARATH, SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, SMT.SAILAKSHMI MENON, SMT. AASHI K. SHAJAN, SHRI.HAFEEZ MUHAMMED, SMT.BINITHA MARIA THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI.U. JAYAKRISHNAN, PP.

Bail can be granted when continued detention is not necessary, especially for applicants without a criminal record.

Headnote:The application was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail. The accused, who has no criminal antecedents, was implicated in a case regarding possession of arrack distilling equipment and wash. The court determined that the continued detention was not necessary and granted bail under strict conditions. The main issue was whether the applicant was entitled to bail considering the circumstances around the alleged crime. The court ruled that the applicant was entitled to bail given the absence of compelling reasons for continued custody.

Table of Content
1. application for bail filed under specific legislative provisions. (Para 1)
2. details of the criminal charges related to possession and distilling equipment. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments from both the applicant and prosecution regarding bail eligibility. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's decision on bail and prescribed conditions. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.352/2025 of Excise Range Office, Adoor, Pathanamthitta District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 55 (g)

of the Kerala Abkari Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant along with the accused No.2 was found in possession of 225 litres of wash and utensils for distilling the arrack inside their house on 20.12.2025 at 2.40 pm in contravention of the Abkari Act and Rules.

4. I have heard Sri. Manu Ramachandran, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. U. Jayakrishnan, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, she is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and she is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 20.12.2025. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. She shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top