Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
M/S.COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cial’s establishment and public authority status. (Para 4 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. contentions of cial versus claims of respondents. (Para 5 , 6 , 24) |
| 3. court’s standpoint on public authority definitions. (Para 8 , 18 , 26) |
| 4. cial is established as a public authority under rti act. (Para 54 , 55) |
| 5. dismissal of appeals with directions. (Para 59) |
JUDGMENT
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Heard Sri.S.Sreekumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant with Adv.Sri.S.Harikrishnan, and Sri.M.Ajay and Sri.Paul Jacob, learned counsel appearing for respondents.
2. Taking into consideration the facts and the similitude of the controversy involved in these batch of appeals, they have been heard analogously and decided by this common judgment.
3. The facts of W.A No.45 of 2023 are taken up for consideration for deciding the batch of appeals.
4. The present appeals arise against the final judgment dated 02.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 20387 of 2019 and connected cases (Cochin International Airport Ltd. v. The State Information Commission & Another), wherein the Court after undertaking a meticulous analysis concluded that the Cochin In
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
