SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MINAJUL HAQUE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 117 OF 2026|CRIME NO.716/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH, SRI.LIBIN STANLEY, SMT.SAIPOOJA, SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL, SMT.R.GAYATHRI, SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA, SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH, SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE
For the Respondents: SMT.M.K. PUSHPALATHA

A defendant may be granted bail even with criminal antecedents if the ongoing detention lacks necessity and no compelling evidence is presented.

Headnote:This application seeks bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 due to possession of ganja. The court found insufficient evidence to deny bail considering the applicant's previous cases were of small quantities. The main issue was the entitlement to bail given the circumstances. The court's reasoning affirmed that continued detention was unnecessary based on past offences. The application for bail was allowed with specific conditions set by the court.

Table of Content
1. bail application under relevant law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented for and against the bail. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's justification for granting bail. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.716/2024 of Kalamassery Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant was found in possession of 1.622 kgs of ganja on 25.07.2024 at 05:30 p.m., and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri. P. Mohamed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 25.07.2024. The accused No.2 is already on bail. The final report has already been filed. It is true that the applicant has criminal antecedents involving offences of a similar nature. He is involved in five cases under the NDPS Act. But the quantity involved in all those cases are small quantity and they are bailable in nature. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(iii) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(iv) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(v) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top