Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MINAJUL HAQUE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application under relevant law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented for and against the bail. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's justification for granting bail. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.716/2024 of Kalamassery Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant was found in possession of 1.622 kgs of ganja on 25.07.2024 at 05:30 p.m., and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri. P. Mohamed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
