SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2762

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SYAMLAL – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2939 OF 2026



Important Points

Court directed issuance of a Customized Police Clearance Certificate despite criminal involvement, highlighting judicial discretion.

Subject

Writ Jurisdiction - Civil Matters

Headnote

The judgment pertains to a writ petition concerning the denial of a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) to the petitioner due to involvement in a criminal case. The Court directs issuance of a Customized PCC while acknowledging the details of the case from the Magistrate's order. The ruling underscores the necessity of balancing procedural requirements with individual rights under judicial oversight.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM, SHRI.THOMAS C.ABRAHAM
For the Respondents: SMT. O.M. SHALINA, DSGI, SMT. DEVI, SHRI R., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Table of Content
1. denial of pcc due to criminal involvement. (Para 1)
2. judicial discretion in issuing pcc. (Para 2)
3. court's directive for customized pcc. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved as the 1st respondent has not considered his request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC)

favourably.

2. The learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case and therefore, only a Customised PCC can be issued, and that too only on orders from this Court.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent and having perused Ext.P3 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavara, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the case mentioned in Ext.P3 order. The needful shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top