SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ASHMA DANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38507 OF 2025



Important Points

The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition upon request from the petitioner's counsel, leading to its dismissal.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

The petitioners, represented by their counsel, sought permission to withdraw a writ petition pursuant to the provisions governing such applications. The court granted permission and concluded that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, reflecting the court's acceptance of the withdrawal on this date.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JITHIN BABU A, SHRI.ARUN SAMUEL, SHRI.CLETUS THOTTAPILLY, SHRI.ANOOD JALAL K.J., SMT.DONA MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI.N.L.BITTO, SRI.SHAMEER P.M.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top