Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ASHMA DANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38507 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JITHIN BABU A, SHRI.ARUN SAMUEL, SHRI.CLETUS THOTTAPILLY, SHRI.ANOOD JALAL K.J., SMT.DONA MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI.N.L.BITTO, SRI.SHAMEER P.M.

The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition upon request from the petitioner's counsel, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:The petitioners, represented by their counsel, sought permission to withdraw a writ petition pursuant to the provisions governing such applications. The court granted permission and concluded that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, reflecting the court's acceptance of the withdrawal on this date.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JASHMA DANY – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 38507 OF 2025

The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition upon request from the petitioner's counsel, leading to its dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ASHMA DANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38507 OF 2025