SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2850

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RAMYA A K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 147 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.882/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SMT.SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB, SMT.ANJANA KRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Bail granted under BNSS Act considering the lack of direct evidence and nearing completion of investigation.

Headnote:This application concerns pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of the BNSS Act, 2023. The petitioner, accused No.3, is implicated in financial offences concerning the BUDS Act and IPC for not repaying deposit amounts. The court considered the insufficiency of evidence for custodial interrogation despite serious allegations and granted bail with conditions. It was framed as: 'Whether the circumstances warrant bail?' The Court reasoned that the investigation is nearing completion, and there is no direct evidence against the petitioner.

Result: The bail application is allowed subject to fulfilling specific conditions of cooperation and constraints on behavior.

Table of Content
1. overview of bail request and underlying case specifics. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding bail and implications for investigation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's decision on bail grant and associated conditions. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.3 in Crime No.882/2025 of Vadakkancherry Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 4 06 and 420 read with Section 3 4 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘ IPC ’) and read with Section 21 , Section 4 read with Section 22 , Section 5 read with Section 23 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, 2019 (for short ‘BUDS Act’).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant, being one of the Managing Directors of the financial institution by name Finspot India Nidhi Limited, having its branch office at Vadakkencherry, received a total amount of Rs.19,65,000/- from the defacto complainant and his wife as fixed deposit promising to return it with interest but the principal amount or the interest was not paid, thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, she is entitled to bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant’s intentional criminal acts, and if she is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The applicant is one of the Managing Directors of the company. The applicant directly did not receive any money from the customers. The investigation of the case is almost over. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, her custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting herself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. She shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top