IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NABEEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court allowed the bail with specified conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. the applicant committed offences against the complainant. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding the necessity and implications of bail. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.574/2025 of Pandikkad Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 85 , 316(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 03.12.2020, the applicant married the defacto complainant and while living together as husband and wife, on 27-03-2025, the applicant physically tortured the defacto complainant after misappropriating her gold and also by demanding more dowry. Thus, the applicant committed the above said offences.
4. I have heard Sri. K. Rakesh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.