Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
EX- HAW. NARAYANAN K.K – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition seeks correction of an oversight in earlier judgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel contends for consideration of omitted arguments in prior proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
Muralee Krishna, J.
This review petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, by the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.39654 of 2024, contending that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 22.05.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court, wherein one among us [Muralee Krishna S., J.] was sitting along with Amit Rawal, J., by which the writ petition was dismissed. Since Amit Rawal, J., demitted office, this review petition is listed before this Bench, as per roster.
2. W.P.(C)No.39654 of 2024 was filed by the petitioner, who was discharged from the Indian Army. Contending that his request for disability pension claim was unreasonably rejected, he approached the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kochi, with O.A.No.244 of 2021 filed under Section 14 (2) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act , 2007. By the order dated 22.08.2023, the Tribunal found that the petitioner is entitled to disability element
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
