Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE – Appellant
Versus
JIJO JOY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. understanding the context of environmental clearances and their amendments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments against the legality and implications of amendments to the eia notification. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. analysis of jurisdiction and maintainability in light of public interest concerns. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. the principle of safeguarding environmental standards over legislative amendments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. the court's decision-making process concerning public interests and constitutional validity. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J
The above writ appeals filed under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, arises out of the judgment dated 26.08.2025 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)No.23150 of 2023 and connected matters, treating W.P.(C)No.44547 of 2024 as the leading case.
2. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, issued notification, S.O.1807(E) dated 12.04.2022 [Ext.P8 in W.P.(C)No.44547 of 2024] amending the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, extending the validity period of the Environmental Clearance for certain projects and activities. It was followe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
