Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SAKEER T.A – Appellant
Versus
PENGATTUSSERY MUSLIM JAMA-ATH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and its fundamental issues related to wakf board governance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court's directive for the wakf board to consider applications expediently in light of upcoming elections. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. petitioners' grievances over the wakf board's inaction and the need for urgent decisions before elections. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioners filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 26th respondent - the Kerala State Wakf Board (‘Wakf Board’ for short) to dispose of Ext.P4 original petition bearing No.192 of 2025 and Exts.P5, P7 and P8 interlocutory applications filed by the petitioners in that original petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioners are permanent members of the Pengattussery Muslim Jama-ath, a Wakf registered with the Wakf Board and governed by an approved by-law. The Wakf is a major religious and charitable institution possessing extensive movable and immovable properties and generating several crores of rupees annually through multiple revenue streams, i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
