Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
EDWERED SUKUMARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought additional time for compensation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. deposit made; hence, warrant to be set aside (Para 3) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
---------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No.125 OF 2026 ------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2026 ORDER The Crl.M.C. is filed to recall the warrant of arrest that was issued against the petitioner to execute the sentence passed against him in ST No.1058/2015 by the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palakkad.
2. When the Crl.M.C. came up for consideration on
08.01.2026, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner only required ten days time to deposit the entire compensation amount. Consequently, this Court directed the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palakkad to defer all further coercive proceedings as against the petitioner.
3. Today when the case was taken up for consideration, the learned Counsel for the petitioner has handed over the receipt making the deposit before the above Court.
In light of the deposit made by the petitioner, I am of the definite view that the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner is to be set aside and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
