Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. JAYAKUMAR, J
RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
P.RAJENDRAN NAIR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. limitations of revisional jurisdiction discussed. (Para 6) |
| 2. importance of compensation and its enforcement. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. final decision and adjustments to the existing rulings. (Para 8 , 12) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. V. JAYAKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 2ND MAGHA, 1947 CRL.REV.PET NO. 878 OF 2012 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.02.2012 IN Crl.A NO.759 OF 2010 OF SESSIONS COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.09.2010 IN CC NO.476 OF 2007 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -VII, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
RAJAN, PUTHUVAL PUTHEN VEEDU, TC V111/458, MANGAUD, THIRUMALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENTS:
1 P.RAJENDRAN NAIR MANIKANTA NIVAS,PERMTHOTTATHU, POOZHIKUNNU ESTATE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695007.
2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
ADV. ALEX M THOMBRA, SR. PP.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 22.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This revision petition is preferred impugning the judgment of the Sessions
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
