Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
KIRNAN ALIAS MUHASIN.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal for anticipatory bail due to no prima facie evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations concerning the commission of offenses under sc/st act. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments presented regarding innocence and necessity of bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court observations uphold the necessity of bail conditions. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2026 The 4th accused in Crime No.577/2025 of Kalikavu Police Station, Malappuram, filed this appeal challenging the order in Crl.M.P. No.3346 of 2025 dated 22.10.2026, on the files of the learned Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018 (for short, ‘SC/ST (PoA) Act’), whereby the anticipatory bail application filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Special Court.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor. Despite notice served upon the defacto complainant to ensure the mandatory hearing envisaged under the SC/ST (PoA) Act, the defacto complainant did not turn up.
3. In this matter, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Section s 126 (2), 351(2), 115(2), 118(1) r/w Section 3 (5) of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
