Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
REMYA K P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner eligible for hsst (hindi) vacancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. representation academic qualifications questioned. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court directed evaluation of representation. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2026 The petitioner is working as High School Assistant (Hindi) in Kadathanadu Rajas HS School from 08.09.2021 onwards and she is the next person to be promoted / appointed as Higher Secondary School Teacher in the vacancy arose during the Academic Year 2025-2026 in accordance with the Kerala Education Rules , 1959.
2. In the Academic Year 2025-2026, two retirement vacancies of HSST (Hindi) and HSST (Mathematics) arose in the School. The first vacancy arose on 31.03.2025 due to the retirement of the Principal of the School as HSST (Hindi) and the second vacancy arose on
31.05.2025 as HSST (Mathematics).
3. The petitioner stakes a claim for HSST (Hindi) as she is fully qualified for the post. But, the Manager appointed the 5th respondent, who is unqualified, to the post of HSST (Mathematics). However, the said appointment was not approved till date on the ground that she is not having prescribed qualification.
4. According to the pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
