Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SIKKU S S – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court acknowledges merits in the petitioner's request. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ directing the 1st Respondent to take up Exhibit P12 Application and to withdraw Ext P11 order and thereby to number the building of the petitioner within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court, in the interest of justice.
ii. To call for the entire records leading to the issuance of Ext P11 order and to set aside, in the interest of justice.
iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ directing the 1st Respondent not to take any coercive proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P11, in the interest of justice.
iv. Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
v. To Grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice..” [SIC]
2. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that against Ext.P11, the petitioner submitted Ext.P12 before the Corporation. It i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
