SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3276

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SASEENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 36 OF 2026 | SA NO.37 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.N.ANAND, SHRI.RAJESH O.N., SHRI.AMEER SALIM, SHRI.SADIQ NAZAR

The court emphasized that pending a stay petition, taking possession under SARFAESI procedures requires Tribunal consideration.

Headnote:The court analyzed the Securitisation Application under the SARFAESI Act, highlighting that possession was initially scheduled to be taken within a timeframe contrary to a petition pending for a stay. Key facts included that possession sought by the bank was set for a date that conflicted with the pending stay petition. The Court found that consideration of the stay petition by the Tribunal is essential before proceeding with the possession. The primary issue centered on the timing and implications of the ongoing legal proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 3RD MAGHA, 1947 OP (DRT) NO. 36 OF 2026 SA NO.37 OF 2026 OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM PETITIONERS/APPLICANTS IN SA:

1 SASEENDRAN AGED 54 YEARS S/O CHATHUKUTTI, AREEKKAN CHALIL, PANTHIRIKKARA, CHANGAROTH, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673528

2 SHEEBA AGED 49 YEARS W/O. SASEENDRAN AREEKKAN CHALIL, PANTHIRIKKARA, CHANGAROTH, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673528 BY ADVS.

SRI.N.ANAND SHRI.RAJESH O.N. SHRI.AMEER SALIM SHRI.SADIQ NAZAR RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS IN SA:

CANARA BANK PERAMBRA BRANCH MAIN ROAD, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN - 673525 THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT The short issue involved in this Writ Petition is that while a Securitisation Application (S.A), preferred by the petitioners, along with an application for stay of further proceedings, is pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal – I, Ernakulam, the respondent/bank is attempting to take possession of the property by taking recourse to SARFAESI proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the S.A. was filed on 06.01.2026, when possession was scheduled to be taken on 16.01.2026, as seen from Ext.P3. On that date, possession could not be taken and a fresh date has not been scheduled. However, the Advocate Commissioner is pestering the petitioners that possession will be taken soon. Learned counsel would point out that the S.A, along with the stay petition, has been adjourned to 28.01.2026, as could be seen from Ext.P6. The petitioners seek solace from this Court untill 28.01.2026; on which date, the petitioners' stay petition will be considered by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent/bank would submit that as per the instructions received, the taking of possession is scheduled only on 30.01.2026.

3. In the light of the submissions made, this Court directs the Debts Recovery Tribunal – I to consider the stay petition filed in S.A.No.37/2026 on 28.01.2026, itself; or, in case it is being adjourned, to issue necessary orders preserving the subject matter of the S.A. Subject to that condition, this Court is of the opinion that the taking of possession scheduled on 30.01.2026 need not be disturbed.

This Writ Petition will stand disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top