Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NEETHU KIRAN – Appellant
Versus
K.K.MANOJ – Respondent
Con.Case(C) No.3010 of 2025|W.P.(C) No.34532 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.LAKSHMI RAJAN
For the Respondents: SRI V N HARIDAS

The compliance with prior court orders leads to the closure of contempt proceedings.

Headnote:The court analyzed the compliance of the directions laid out in the previous judgment dated 17.10.2025 in W.P.

(C) No.34532 of 2025. The petitioner submitted that all directions have been adhered to. Thus, the court determined that the contempt proceedings were no longer necessary. The final outcome was to close the contempt case.

JUDGMENT

Today, when this Contempt Case (C) came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 17.10.2025 in W.P.(C) No.34532 of

2025 have been complied and the Contempt Case can be closed.

Therefore, Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, JNEETHU KIRAN – AppellantVersusK.K.MANOJ – RespondentCon.Case(C) No.3010 of 2025|W.P.(C) No.34532 of 2025

The compliance with prior court orders leads to the closure of contempt proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NEETHU KIRAN – Appellant
Versus
K.K.MANOJ – Respondent
Con.Case(C) No.3010 of 2025|W.P.(C) No.34532 of 2025