IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
K.S.VIMALA, K.B.MANOJ, K.B.MANJU – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of parties and contract details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidence presented and procedural context. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding limitation raised by parties. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. application of limitations under law and acknowledgement nature. (Para 10) |
| 5. final ruling on claim dismissal due to limitations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
P.Krishna Kumar, J.
The unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money based on a contract is the appellant. The suit was filed on 16.12.1997 as an indigent petition. The trial court found that the suit was barred by limitation.
2. The parties are hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff was awarded two contracts by the first defendant, the Kerala State Electricity Board, on 30.01.1986 (Agreement Nos. 29/85-86 & 30/85-86) for casting 1,500 RCC poles of 8 metres length for the Electrical Major Section, Kannur. The plaintiff completed the work covered by the first agreement within the extended period, namely, on or before 30.01.1987. However, the work covered by the second agreement was not completed within the stipulated or extended time. According to the plaintiff, the delay occurred solely
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.