Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ATHUL A.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14801 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.HILAL BABU, SHRI.BALASUBRAMANYAN, SHRI.ALIF K.S., SMT.PRIYANKA SUSAN RAJU, SHRI.VAISAKH J., SHRI.MUHAMMED ASHIK K.A.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI, SR. PP.

A bail application can be dismissed as infructuous if the matter presented loses its relevance.

Headnote:This bail application pertains to BAIL APPL. NO. 14801 OF 2025 concerning Crime No.1125/2025 filed at Mannanthala Police Station. The petitioner contended that the matter is now infructuous. The Court found no grounds for granting bail based on provided submissions. The core issue was whether there were valid reasons to maintain the bail application. Ultimately, the bail was denied as it became infructuous.

O R D E R

Dated this the 27^th day of January, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Hence, this bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JATHUL A.V – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentBAIL APPL. NO. 14801 OF 2025

A bail application can be dismissed as infructuous if the matter presented loses its relevance.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ATHUL A.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14801 OF 2025