Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR. K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
PERUMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the crime and victim's background. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. police investigation and evidence collection. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. initial court procedures and defendant's plea. (Para 10) |
| 4. defendant's arguments against conviction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. prosecution's response to defense arguments. (Para 15) |
| 6. witness testimonies regarding last seen and evidence. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. cross-examination findings and credibility of testimony. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. inconsistencies in auto driver witnesses' statements. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. chopper's recovery and witness verification. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. autopsy findings on the cause of death. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 11. family background and victim's relationship dynamics. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. defence arguments regarding motives. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 13. legal precedents on the importance of motive. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 14. circumstantial evidence requirements for conviction. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 15. issues with the evidential chain. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 16. court's determination of reasonable doubt and acquittal. (Par |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
