SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3403

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RAJESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 103 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.1245/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI

The court established that lack of evidence against an accused can warrant bail under specific conditions.

Headnote:This application concerns Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking bail for accused No.3, RAJESH, involved in a case under the Abkari Act. The court found insufficient evidence against the applicant connecting him to the crime. The primary issues were the applicant’s alleged innocence and lack of evidence. The court determined that continued detention was unnecessary, allowing bail under specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding the alleged offence. (Para 2)
2. court's evaluation of the need for bail and its granting conditions. (Para 4)
3. debate on the applicant's innocence and alleged evidence. (Para 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.3 in Crime No.1245/2025 of Chittur Police Station, Palakkad District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

02.12.2025 at 1.51 PM, accused Nos. 1 and 2 with intent to make huge profit, kept 501.5 litres of spirit in 18 cans of 35 litres capacity without any documents in the shed near to their house which was found by the S.I. of Police, Chittur Police Station and he seized the property as per search list and arrested the accused and thereby the applicant committed the aforesaid offence.

4. I have heard Sri.Nireesh Mathew, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

03.12.2025. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

DSV/28.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top