IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
LINU V.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 121 OF 2026|CRIME NO.996/2017
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of charges and nature of the crime. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments concerning applicant's innocence and prosecution's claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ) seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.996/2017 of Adimaly Police Station, Idukki District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code , Sections 66E , 67 and 67 A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant fostered a relationship with CW1 survivor, thereafter repeatedly raped her, managed to capture her obscene videos and nude images, then uploaded the same in the internet and transmitted the same through social media platfoms and thereby committed the above said offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Subi K., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on
17.11.2025. A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. The applicant was released on bail several times and he absconded each time. Finally, he was arrested by a team constituted by the District Police Chief Police on 17.11.2025 and he is in judicial custody since then. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the trial of the case is going on. In these circumstances, I am of the view that the applicant cannot be released on bail. The bail application, accordingly, is dismissed.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.