SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3406

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
PINTU NANDA BEHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 286 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.1386/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ROHIT BABEN, SHRI.R.AVINASH
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD

The lack of substantial connection to the crime warrants bail despite serious charges.

Headnote:This court reviews a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused in Crime No.1386/2025. The prosecution alleges possession of ganja by the accused. The court notes no substantial evidence linking the accused to the crime and acknowledges their lack of criminal history, allowing bail. The court frames the issue as whether there exists just cause for denial of bail, concluding that detention is no longer warranted given the nearly completed investigation. Thus, the applicants are granted bail contingent upon certain conditions.

Table of Content
1. possession of narcotics leads to serious charges. (Para 2 , 3)
2. defense argues lack of evidence supports bail. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ) seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.1386/2025 of Palakkad Town North Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(B) read with 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 20.12.2025 at about 08:20 hours, the applicants were found in possession and transportation of 10.995 kilograms of ganja in a shoulder bag and thereby committed the above said offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Rohit Baben, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on

20.12.2025. The investigation is almost over and recovery has been effected. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

SKP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top