SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
JOHAN GEORGIE JAMES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 334 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.700/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.NAVEEN THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI, SR. PP

The court found insufficient evidence to continue detention, leading to the granting of bail under specified conditions.

Headnote:The applicant seeks bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, alleging being falsely implicated as the accused in Crime No. 700 of 2025 for cheating. The court underscores that while the prosecution asserts intentional criminal acts, the evidence does not prima facie suggest an intention to cheat. The appellate court reiterates the absence of mandatory direct allegations against the applicant, allowing bail under certain conditions.

Table of Content
1. bail sought under bnss citing false accusation and lack of evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. arguments presented regarding the applicant's innocence and prosecution's claims. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.4 in Crime No. 700 of 2025 of Thiruvambady Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections

406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC .

4. The prosecution case is that the applicant being the Managing Director of Nedumparambil Nidhi Limited induced the defacto complainant to deposit amount promising interest and thereafter cheated him without giving interest as promised or returning the amount invested and thereby committed the offences.

5. I have heard Sri.Naveen Thomas, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C. Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

6. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

7. The applicant was formally arrested on

2.12.2025. The investigation is almost over. In a connected crime (Crime No.889 of 2025) while dismissing the bail application moved by the applicant, the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam has observed that there is no allegation that the applicant has dishonestly induced the defacto complainant's husband to invest the money in the company and there is also no allegation that the company does not have license from Reserve Bank of India to collect deposits from public. It was further found that the remand report does not prima-facie suggest that the applicant had intention to cheat the defacto complainant from the very inception. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 334 OF 2026 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A 1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR(CRIME) NO. 700 / 2025 OF THIRUVAMBADY POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE RURAL Annexure A 2 THE TRUE COPY OF EMAIL DATED 14-7-2025 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ,KERALA Annexure A 3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top