SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3413

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
1 STALIN.S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 363 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ADIL.M.H
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI

The court determined that continued detention was unnecessary due to lack of evidence and the applicant's clean antecedents.

Headnote:This bail application was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the first accused in Crime No.1217/2025, where multiple serious offences were alleged. The court found that the applicant, with no prior criminal record, was entitled to bail as detention was unnecessary. Key issues included whether sufficient evidence existed to connect the applicant to the crime and considerations regarding judicial custody duration. The court ultimately allowed bail under specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. bail application filed under bnss concerning serious charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by both applicant's counsel and prosecutor. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.1217/2025 of Chottanikkara Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(3), 126(2), 118(1), 333, 109(1) and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 01.12.2025 at about 1.00 a.m., the accused persons, sharing a common object to kill one Shihab, trespassed into a room where the defacto complainant and others were residing, assaulted them with deadly weapons and thereby committed the above offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Adhil M.H., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

01.12.2025. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has been effected. All the other accused are on bail. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

SKP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top