SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
HARI SHRESHTHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 418 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.191/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

The court emphasizes the importance of weighing circumstances justifying bail, highlighting the necessity of individual rights against prosecutorial concerns.

Headnote:This court adjudicates a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 concerning Crime No.191/2025 under the Kerala Abkari Act for allegedly possessing liquor illegally. The applicant contends innocence and lack of connection to the offense, while prosecution advocates for continued detention. However, upon review, the court grants bail with stipulated conditions, concluding that continued custody is unwarranted.

Table of Content
1. application for bail under bnss; (Para 1 , 2)
2. nature of accusations regarding possession of illicit liquor; (Para 4)
3. arguments for and against bail; (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.191/2025 of Varkala Excise Range, Thiruvananthapuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections

55(i), 58, 8(1) and 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

12.12.2025 at 2.45 pm, the applicant was found in possession of 26 litres of beer, 6.75 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, 5 litres of illicit liquor and .08 litres of illicit arrack in the house named “Rose Manzil” bearing No.88 in Ward No.28 of Varkala Municipality, Thiruvambady Road, Mangalamukku Desom in contravention of the Abkari Act and Rules.

4. I have heard Sri. J.R. Prem Navaz, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Sreeja V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 12.12.2025. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required. (iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 418 OF 2026 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT IN CRIME NO: 191/2025 OF VARKALA EXCISE RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT Annexure A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED

16.01.2025 IN CRL.M.C NO: 3886 OF 2025, PASSED BY THE HON’BLE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Annexure A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top