Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3419

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUDHEER Y – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 580 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.1070/2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.G.SREEJITH, SMT.ANJANA A., SMT.VIDYAJITH M., SMT.ANJU P.S.
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V.

The court acknowledges the applicant's request to withdraw the bail application and dismisses it as withdrawn, highlighting the procedural aspect of bail applications.

Headnote:The judgment concerns Bail Application No. 580 of 2026 under Crime No. 1070/2025. The applicant seeks withdrawal of the bail application and is granted permission to do so. Hence, the application is dismissed as withdrawn, reflecting the court's procedure on voluntary withdrawal of an application.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3419

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JSUDHEER Y – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentBAIL APPL. NO. 580 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.1070/2025

The court acknowledges the applicant's request to withdraw the bail application and dismisses it as withdrawn, highlighting the procedural aspect of bail applications.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUDHEER Y – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 580 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.1070/2025