SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ARUN T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.SANIL KUMAR
For the Respondents: C.K.SURESH

ORDER

[Bail Appl. Nos.13498/2025, 13500/2025]

These applications are filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS )

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant in B.A.No.13498/2025 is the accused No.1 and the applicant in B.A.No.13500/2025 is the accused No.2 in Crime No.1315/2025 of Puthoor Police Station, Kollam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 103 (1), 296(b), 329(3), 351(3) read with 3(5) of of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNS ).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused Nos.1 and 2, in furtherance of their common intention, out of previous enmity towards Sri.Gokulnath, on 06.10.2025 at 8.30 pm, trespassed into the house named Gokulam veedu situated in Pavithreswaram Village, uttered obscene words and threatened to kill Sri.Gokulnath. Accused Nos.1 and 2, thereafter, on the same day itself, at 22.30 pm, intercepted Sri.Gokulnath at the Kanal road in Pavithreswaram Village and hit on his head and body with a stick like instrument, thereby caused grievous hurt to him, and he succumbed to the injuries.

4. I have heard Sri.Sanil Kumar A., the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top