Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
RASOOL M.B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10787 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.146/2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.JOHN SEBASTIAN RALPH, VISHNU CHANDRAN, RALPH RETI JOHN, GIRIDHAR KRISHNA KUMAR, GEETHU T.A, MARY GREESHMA, LIZ JOHNY, KRISHNAPRIYA SREEKUMAR, ABHIJITH P.S, DEVIKA MANOJ
For the Respondents: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous case by the petitioner is permissible with the court's approval.

Headnote:The High Court in its jurisdiction examined the withdrawal motion concerning Crl.M.C. No. 10787 of 2025, originating from the Judicial Magistrate's order dated 24.09.2025. The Court found the motion was made by the petitioner to dismiss the application voluntarily. The Court expressed no objections to the withdrawal, affirming the procedure followed. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C. Permission is granted. The Crl.M.C. stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG. GIRISH, JRASOOL M.B – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 10787 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.146/2024

Withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous case by the petitioner is permissible with the court's approval.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
RASOOL M.B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10787 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.146/2024