SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3436

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
RADHAKRISHNAN .P. – Appellant
Versus
THE KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATION COMPANY PVT. LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10830 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.A.A.SHIBI, SMT.MANJUSHA K.U.
For the Respondents: SHRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS, SRI.ISAAC THOMAS, SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM, SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS, SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA, SHRI.JOHN VITHAYATHIL, SHRI.AIBEL MATHEW SIBY, SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS

The court upheld the requirement for proper application submission before granting electric connections, emphasizing adherence to procedural norms.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to provide electric connection without insisting on NOC from revenue authorities (see page 1). The 1st respondent argued that the application was not in prescribed format and agreed to process a proper application within 15 days (see page 2). The court directed the petitioner to submit a new application in the correct format within 15 days, leaving other contentions open (see page 3).

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks electric connection. (Para 1)
2. respondent's argument on application format. (Para 2)
3. court's direction on application submission. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to provide electric connection to the petitioner's building bearing No. X/1504(UA) of Munnar Panchayath without insisting NOC from the revenue authorities.

ii. Direct the 1st respondent to consider the exhibit P2 application of the petitioner and provide electricity connection within stipulated time.

iii.Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the Case.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the petitioner’s application is not in the prescribed format, and if a proper application is made, orders will be passed on the same in accordance with law, within 15 days from the date of receipt of the application. This is recorded.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to make an application in the prescribed format and on receipt of the same, the 1st respondent shall pass orders in accordance with law, within 15 days from the date of receipt of the application. All the contentions of the parties are left open.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top