IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SULAIHAMMA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioners approached this Court, aggrieved by Ext.P6 notice issued by the P.W.D, Pathanamthitta, alleging that the petitioners had trespassed into the footpath, and have paved interlock tiles therein. As per Ext.P6, the petitioners were directed to remove the interlock tiles, failing which, the same will be done by the Department.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader would submit that, on a further inspection conducted at the site, it is found that there is no encroachment on the part of the petitioners. In the circumstances, Ext.P6 will not be enforced. The submission is recorded and on the strength of it, the Writ Petition (Civil) will stand closed. Needless to say that there shall not be any precipitate action against the petitioners for removal of tiles, as contemplated in Ext.P6.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.